The brief delivers a sharp critique of the EU’s regulatory machine and lands on an awkward conclusion – Europe’s problem is no longer lack of ambition, but too much poorly controlled lawmaking. Brussels keeps piling on rules in the name of protection, fairness and strategy. The result is a regulatory thicket that slows growth, scares investment and weakens Europe’s ability to compete. The paper argues that “better regulation” has become a slogan masking systemic failure.

The analysis warns that Washington’s hardening “Donroe Doctrine” has now reached the Arctic – and Europe is not ready for the consequences. What once felt like a remote, cooperative space is turning into a theatre of power politics where the United States moves first and sets terms. The piece argues that Europe’s Arctic influence is thinning fast as American priorities tighten and security logic crowds out partnership.

The commentary delivers a sobering security forecast for 2026 and makes one thing clear – Europe is entering a year of elevated danger with little margin for error. Conflict risks are multiplying on Europe’s borders and beyond, while the EU’s ability to shape events remains limited. The piece argues that this is no longer about isolated crises. It is about a crowded threat landscape where several conflicts could escalate at once and stretch Europe’s attention, resources and unity.

The commentary delivers a pointed claim that stings in European capitals – as Donald Trump enters 2026, he looks more decisive on Europe’s future than Europe’s own leaders. While Brussels debates processes and Berlin hesitates, Trump acts, signals and sets terms. The piece argues that Europe’s leadership vacuum has become so visible that an American outsider once again fills the space by default.

The analysis pulls no punches and argues that Europe’s claim to geopolitical clout is a carefully maintained illusion. Beneath the grand speeches and strategic documents, the EU lacks the tools, unity and speed to act like the power it pretends to be. The piece says the problem is no longer hidden. Crises have stripped away the costume, leaving a bloc that talks big and delivers small.

The analysis dissects NATO’s new defence spending target and warns that what looks like resolve on paper could backfire in practice. The higher benchmark is meant to show seriousness to allies and adversaries alike. Instead, it risks exposing uneven commitment, hollow compliance and political theatre across Europe. The piece argues that the signal is strong, but the foundations underneath are shaky.

The commentary surveys Europe’s China debate at the start of 2026 and delivers an uneasy conclusion – Brussels is watching closely, but still reacting late. Europe tracks Beijing’s moves with growing concern, yet struggles to turn observation into strategy. The piece argues that while awareness has improved, control has not. Europe knows the risks. It just hasn’t decided what it is willing to sacrifice to reduce them.