This IISS strategic commentary exposes a core vulnerability at the heart of Europe’s industrial and technological ambitions. As the EU pushes clean tech, defence production and digital infrastructure, it remains heavily dependent on China for critical minerals and processing capacity. Despite loud talk of “de-risking”, Europe still relies on Chinese-controlled supply chains that can be tightened or weaponised at any moment.

This CIDOB analysis questions whether the EU has lost its sense of direction by trying to balance big external ambitions with slow internal reform. Europe talks about strategic autonomy, competitiveness and global influence, but its internal economic, regulatory and institutional weaknesses make these ambitions hard to realise. The text suggests a growing mismatch: the EU wants to shape the world, but it cannot fix the fundamentals at home. If this gap persists, Europe’s global role will weaken and its economy will stagnate.

This Institut Montaigne analysis warns that Europe’s clean-tech ambitions rest on a fragile foundation. While the EU pushes ahead with decarbonisation, much of the technology powering the green transition remains dominated by Chinese firms and value chains. Batteries, solar panels and other core components are still produced at scale in China, while European companies face barriers abroad. The risk is stark: Europe may end up financing a green transition it does not control.

This IRIS analysis delivers a sharp warning Europe does not want to hear – the risk of EU fragmentation is no longer theoretical. Economic weakness, repeated crises, and rising political polarisation are building pressure inside the Union. The text argues Europe needs “productive resilience” – real industrial and economic capacity – to hold the EU together. Without it, Europe risks becoming a bloc held by rules and habit, not by strength, growth or shared confidence.

This CEPA analysis argues the West is finally shaking off years of complacency. Russia’s war in Ukraine and China’s rise have forced a rethink in both Washington and European capitals. But the text also makes one thing clear: Europe is still playing catch-up. The US has momentum, money, and strategic clarity. Europe has speeches, slow procurement, and political hesitation. The worry running through this analysis is obvious – Europe may be awake, but it is not ready.

This final HCSS “Draghi Report Revisited” conclusion delivers a clear message – Europe has not fixed the problems Draghi highlighted, and in some areas it is slipping further back. The EU has launched initiatives, announced action plans and promised reforms, but the real gap remains: delivery is too slow, funding is too limited, and national politics still blocks a united strategy. The overall picture is gloomy. Europe faces tougher global competition, rising security threats, and a fragile economic base – yet it still struggles to act like a serious power.

This AEI analysis argues Europe’s economic slowdown is not just Europe’s problem – it is a growing risk for the United States as well. A weaker Europe means weaker demand, less innovation, more political instability, and a less capable security partner. The author’s point is blunt: Europe is underperforming, falling behind the US in growth and productivity, and if this trend continues it will hurt American interests. Europe is supposed to be the US’s strongest ally. Right now, it looks like a drag.